<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Better MEX error messages	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/better-mex-error-messages/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/better-mex-error-messages?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=better-mex-error-messages</link>
	<description>Professional Matlab consulting, development and training</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:42:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pavel Holoborodko		</title>
		<link>https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/better-mex-error-messages#comment-370568</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pavel Holoborodko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2016 11:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undocumentedmatlab.com/?p=6287#comment-370568</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/better-mex-error-messages#comment-370525&quot;&gt;Yaroslav&lt;/a&gt;.

I guess it will come down to compatibility of &lt;code&gt;setjmp/longjmp&lt;/code&gt; used in LIBC, that you compile your MEX against.
(C++ exceptions are implemented through these low-level functions with all the additional things for calling class destructors, etc.)

Cannot say about Fortran though - but probably the situation is similar there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/better-mex-error-messages#comment-370525">Yaroslav</a>.</p>
<p>I guess it will come down to compatibility of <code>setjmp/longjmp</code> used in LIBC, that you compile your MEX against.<br />
(C++ exceptions are implemented through these low-level functions with all the additional things for calling class destructors, etc.)</p>
<p>Cannot say about Fortran though &#8211; but probably the situation is similar there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yaroslav		</title>
		<link>https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/better-mex-error-messages#comment-370525</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yaroslav]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2016 18:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://undocumentedmatlab.com/?p=6287#comment-370525</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A very interesting post. Is this problem persists for compiling MEX with &lt;code&gt;c&lt;/code&gt; or &lt;code&gt;Fortran&lt;/code&gt;, or is there another behaviour altogether?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very interesting post. Is this problem persists for compiling MEX with <code>c</code> or <code>Fortran</code>, or is there another behaviour altogether?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
