Comments on: Improving Simulink performance https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/improving-simulink-performance?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=improving-simulink-performance Professional Matlab consulting, development and training Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:17:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: Etienne https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/improving-simulink-performance#comment-314561 Mon, 17 Feb 2014 21:17:00 +0000 http://undocumentedmatlab.com/?p=4641#comment-314561 In reply to Yair Altman.

Thanks Yair.

]]> By: Yair Altman https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/improving-simulink-performance#comment-314383 Sun, 16 Feb 2014 23:03:07 +0000 http://undocumentedmatlab.com/?p=4641#comment-314383 In reply to Etienne.

@Etienne – perhaps you haven’t looked close enough? I think that TLC is actually extensively documented here. If this is not enough, then there is also a quick reference and even a 340-page PDF document (which is admittedly quite old). I can’t vouch for the quality of the documentation as I’ve never used TLC, but at least judging by the quantity, reading all of it should keep you busy for quite some time…

]]> By: Etienne https://undocumentedmatlab.com/articles/improving-simulink-performance#comment-314365 Sun, 16 Feb 2014 20:27:24 +0000 http://undocumentedmatlab.com/?p=4641#comment-314365 I would appreciate any advice on speeding up mexCallMatlab functionality. At the moment I have a fortran mex function that calls a Matlab function via mexCallMatlab, that then calls the derivative values of a Simulink model. This is painfully slow and I am trying to figure out how to write a TLC script that can generate C-code from the Simulink model in the correct format, so that I can avoid mexCallMatlab all together, but the TLC functionality is not very well documented as far as I can tell.

]]>